‘Medication gatekeepers’ wued by FTC over skyrocketing insulin prices

The Federal Trade Commission sued the country’s three largest pharmacy benefit managers on Friday, accusing them of steering diabetes patients towards higher priced insulin in order to reap millions of dollars in rebates from pharmaceutical companies.

The case accuses UnitedHealth Group’s Optum unit, CVS Health’s CVS Caremark and Cigna’s Express Scripts of unfairly excluding lower cost insulin products from lists of drugs covered by insurers.

Driving down drug prices has been a key goal for the Joe Biden administration, and Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee, has emphasized her work for patients, and in particular on lowering insulin prices, on the campaign trial.

The conduct hurt patients, such as those with coinsurance and deductibles, who were not eligible for the rebated price, the FTC said.

The three companies together administer 80% of all prescriptions in the US, according to the case, which was filed in the FTC’s in-house court.

CVS spokesman David Whitrap said in an emailed statement that the company has worked to make insulin more affordable for Americans and described the FTC as being “simply wrong.

“We stand by our record of protecting American businesses, unions, and patients from rising prescription drug prices,” he said.

Cigna Chief Legal Officer Andrea Nelson said that the FTC was interested in scoring political points.

If the FTC were to succeed in forcing it and others to include drugs that have higher total net costs for health plans, “the FTC will drive drug prices higher in this country,” Nelson said.

Optum Rx spokesperson Elizabeth Hoff called the action baseless and said that through negotiations and additional actions, the company has lowered insulin costs for its health plan customers and members to an average of less than $18 per month for insulin.

CVS shares fell 1.6% in midday trading, while UnitedHealth and Cigna shares were down marginally.

The suit also named Zinc Health Services, Ascent Health Services, and Emisar Pharma Services, purchasing organizations created by the companies in recent years.

‘Medication gatekeepers”

Rahul Rao, Deputy Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, said in a statement that the three pharmacy benefit managers are “medication gatekeepers” that have “extracted millions of dollars off the backs of patients who need life-saving medications.”

“Millions of Americans with diabetes need insulin to survive, yet for many of these vulnerable patients, their insulin drug costs have skyrocketed over the past decade thanks in part to powerful PBMs and their greed,” he said.

The FTC did not sue the three major makers of insulin, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, and Novo Nordisk, but it did criticize their role in what it called a broken system, and said it reserves the right to sue the pharmaceutical companies later.

The drugmaker’s shares did not react on Friday afternoon.

CVS Caremark said in its statement that any attempt to curtail pharmacy benefit managers’ ability to negotiate drug prices will only benefit pharmaceutical companies.

The three PBMs have criticized the FTC’s approach to the industry, accusing it of bias.

Express Scripts sued the FTC earlier this week seeking to force it to withdraw a report that said PBMs enrich themselves at the expense of smaller pharmacies.

The case will be heard by one of the FTC’s three administrative law judges, who are appointed by the five-member commission.

An FTC official said that, in general, the agency’s in-house docket typically moves rapidly and allows for extensive exchange of evidence between the parties.