United Kingdom

‘Why is alcohol allowed where crucial decisions are made?’

A reader says other jobs with serious responsibilities don’t allow drinking on the job and require substance tests, so why is it a different story in Parliament?(Credits: Getty Images)

Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments.

Should MPs fast mandatory drug and alcohol testing?

Police are investigating whether a woman had her drink spiked in a bar at the Houses of Parliament (Metro, Fri).

Can someone explain to me why alcohol is even served within this workplace where important decisions are made?

Train drivers, construction workers, lorry drivers and many other professions have to undergo random drugs and alcohol testing, such is the seriousness of the work involved.

Why is it that politicians don’t have to undergo the same? The decisions they make in their workplace affect an entire nation, yet they can make these decisions while under the influence of alcohol.

Isn’t it time for mandatory drugs and alcohol testing of MPs – especially given some of the decisions that have been made over the last few years! A Scothern, London

Mick Lynch: champion for workers or controversial figure?

Members Of RMT Union On Strike At Euston Train Station
A reader wants detractors to remember Mick Lynch’s commitment to striking rail workers (Picture: Leon Neal/Getty Images)

‘Mick Lynch is a decent, honest, principled person’
Samantha (MetroTalk, Wed) says that soon-to-be retired RMT union leader Mick Lynch is ‘one of the most dishonest, vile people in the country’.

These surely cannot be the thoughts of a sane, rational person.

Mick Lynch is a decent, honest, principled person who has stood up for his members in the face of a Labour Party that largely failed to show support for striking workers and a Tory Party intent to disrupt negotiations at every opportunity.

He will certainly be missed and
I hope he continues to make his voice heard. Niall-Blum Stevenson, Linlithgow

Does Elon Musk have more influence on policy than survivors?

President-Elect Donald Trump Meets With Biden, Congressional Leaders In Washington
Since Elon Musk’s posts on X Yvette Cooper has announced plans for a government backed inquiry into grooming gangs(Picture: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video

The government ignored survivors for years until Elon Musk stepped in’
Abuse survivors spent years fighting for a deeper enquiry into the grooming gangs and no one cared.

Then one overseas billionaire, Elon Musk, agitates for it and all of a sudden it’s happening.

This perfectly sums up the state of government in this country.

Different perspectives give a broader understanding of our world, which is essential for making the right decisions.

But any perspective outside the Whitehall bubble – the rich, the powerful and the media – gets ignored. Until we have a system that gives everyone a voice, we will never have good leadership. Rob Slater, Norfolk

Tony Blair’s not solely to blame for playing field sales…

‘Blair’s government sold 246 fields; the tories sold 279’
I know many view Tony Blair as the anti-Christ but Madeline Bates (MetroTalk, Fri) is wide of the mark when she blames him for selling off school playing fields.

Government figures show that between 2001 and 2010, there were 246 approved applications for playing field land disposal and 279 between 2010-2023. Martin, London

Should businesses that accept cash be held accountable?

Collage image of hand dropping coins into another hand
Being paid cash in hand is not necessarily illegal, but it can be if you do not declare it to HMRC (Credits: Getty Images)

‘Cash-only businesses hide from HMRC – how much is this costing public services’
JW (MetroTalk, Fri) says they have ‘stopped using supermarkets that discriminate against cash payers at self-checkouts’.

Have they considered the range of high street businesses that only take cash? Many barbers, nail bars and others refuse electronic payments, presumably to hide their turnover from HMRC. Does JW think that is acceptable? Imagine the cost of that fraud and the services it might impact. Imagine the extra police or medical staff.

I have paid electronically for six years and use cash about twice a year, usually to give the homeless a helping hand. Henry, Greenwich

Checkout latest world news below links :
World News || Latest News || U.S. News

Source link

Back to top button