United Kingdom

Petty row sees millionaire neighbours trying to build the tallest home on street

The plans would see both properties become much taller (Picture: PA)

A petty planning row over who has the biggest house in a millionaire’s row has broken out in a seaside town.

John Yeoman, 70, and his wife Deborah say they have been victims of a ‘poison pen’ campaign over their plans to build a five storey home next to Poole Harbour, Dorset.

It will be a few inches taller than the next door property, which was built by Jeremy Gardner two years ago.

Now the couple have accused Jeremy of trying to torpedo their plans by ‘orchestrating an unashamed campaign of misformation’ against them.

The saga started after the Yeomans bought 54 Elms Avenue, that overlooks the exclusive Sandbanks peninsula, in 2001 for £1.7m.

The couple demolished the traditional detached house and replaced it with a luxurious three storey home that is today worth £8.8m.

John and Deborah Yeoman believe their neighbour is torpedoing their plans (Picture: Facebook)

In 2015, company director Jeremy Gardner bought 56 Elms Avenue, a modest detached house, for £2.8m.

He secured planning permission to demolish it and build an ultra modern four strorey mansion in its place.

The move infuriated the Yeomans who unsuccessfully objected to the scheme, saying the new home would dwarf theirs and ‘ruin the skyline of Elms Avenue.’

Now Mr Yeoman, a company director and property investor, hopes to ‘reassert the hierarchy of built form within Elms Avenue’ by bulldozing his 20-year-old home and replacing it with a five storey property.

The five bedroom mansion will be just a few inches taller than Mr Gardner’s home.

The Yeomans initially hoped to go even higher with a six storey house but those plans were refused last year.

Jeremy Gardner moved into a home next to the couple in 2015 (Picture: DorsetBizNews)

Giles Moir, of planning agents Chapman Lily who are representing the Yoemans, claimed letters of objection from local residents were the ‘direct result of an orchestrated campaign from the residents of 56 Elms Avenue,’ where Jeremy lives.

He added that ‘misinformation’ about what was planned had been provided to local residents in the form of a leaflet or flyer.

He stated at the time: ‘The flyer produced by the residents of 56 Elms Avenue is an unashamed attempt to provoke objections to the proposal.

‘It is clear from the objections, which all follow a series of common themes, that the letters have been submitted in response to the lobbying campaign undertaken by 56 Elms Avenue.’

Mr and Mrs Yeoman have since taken one level off their planned development that will be five storey flat roofed house built.

The lower ground floor will have an indoor swimming pool complex with sauna, steam room, spa, changing facilities and a garage for a classic car collection.

The street of properties is home to many millionaires (Picture: Google Maps)

Mr Moir said the planned property will be a similar height to Mr Gardner’s house.

When reviewing the application for a six storey house a planning officer for BCP Council said: ’54 Elms Avenue currently appears subordinate in height and massing in comparison with its neighbours.’

Locals fear that because Mr Yoeman wants 17 car parking spaces he will ultimately turn the development into a block of flats.

Mr Gardner, a member of the nearby Salterns Marina Yacht Club, said: ‘The proposed development is absolutely huge, a five-storey block of more than 17,000 sq ft with 17 car parking bays.

‘That is 16 times the size of an average UK home and considerably higher and larger than any of the other two, three and four-storey waterfront houses along Elms Avenue.

‘Whilst most residents would have no objections to a replacement family home of similar proportions to the other waterfront properties, the sheer size of the proposed block is completely at odds with the other properties.’

He also said the height and bulk of the house would ‘give an unacceptable feeling of enclosure’.

David Lush, another neighbour, said: ‘It is not in keeping visually on either sea or land side, nor in keeping with the character of the area.’

Gillian Brown said: ‘It is significantly bigger than any other existing property on the Elms Estate and the height, mass and volume are too much for the plot. The plans would suggest that the development could easily be converted to flats.’

Carol Bishop: ‘This is a ridiculous size for a family home and has obviously been designed to convert into flats very easily. It is completely out of character for the area.’

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at [email protected].

For more stories like this, check our news page.


Checkout latest world news below links :
World News || Latest News || U.S. News

Source link

Back to top button