Andy Serkis Reveals How Snoke Evolved From Star Wars: The Force Awakens To The Last Jedi: “We Were Really Making It Up”
Nearly ten years after the debut of the Star Wars sequel trilogy with Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Supreme Leader Snoke actor Andy Serkis has revealed more about the evolution of his mysterious villain. Snoke was one of many brand-new characters in the Star Wars sequel trilogy’s cast, and his unknown origins made him the center of perhaps some of the most fascinating yet hilarious theories the Star Wars fandom has ever seen. These theories surrounding Snoke became infamous, especially once Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker revealed that Snoke was nothing more than a strandcast clone of Palpatine.
Speaking exclusively to Screen Rant, however, Serkis revealed more about how Snoke’s character came to be over time, and how much agency he had in bringing elements of Snoke to life. “We were really making it up,” Serkis confessed. “But one of the decisions that I did make was that I wanted him to feel like he had suffered some psychological damage, and he had suffered some physical damage – obviously, his scar and his skull being crushed – and he was like a clone gone wrong.“
Serkis also revealed that this was prior to learning that Snoke was, indeed, a clone: ”
That was something that we happened upon and started to think about.
“
This psychological depth for Serkis had everything to do with Snoke’s sense of self-esteem. “He almost felt that, in order to hold onto his power,“ Serkis explained, “he had to put himself out there in a stronger and more malevolent way just to cover up the fact that he felt inadequate.” Of course, even as Serkis portrayed these complicated feelings, not everything about Snoke and his origin had been decided yet. “But in all honesty, there was a mystery around it, and it was crazy,” Serkis revealed. “It was still being evolved as we were making it.”
Snoke Was Yet Another Unplanned Entity In The Star Wars Sequels
No One Really Understood His Mystery
What this means for Star Wars is that Snoke was just another element in the sequel trilogy that was more fluid than many may have realized. Snoke wasn’t a character that Star Wars had even fully fleshed out yet when audiences were creating their intense Snoke theories. According to Serkis, Snoke was a mystery for most of the time that the actor portrayed him. Given how many other characters and elements of the sequel trilogy were also fairly unplanned during the course of its creation and release, this isn’t too surprising to hear, but it is fascinating all the same.
Our Take On The Fluid Nature Of Snoke’s Evolution
It Had An Advantage – & Several Disadvantages
This fluidity works for Snoke mainly because of Serkis’ portrayal, and the thought he put behind the character even without knowing much about him – but it’s also a somewhat dangerous sign of why some things went wrong in the sequel trilogy. Snoke is meant to be the Palpatine-esque villain of both The Force Awakens and Star Wars: The Last Jedi, and yet his characters’ origins were still largely a mystery, even to the actor who was portraying him. While this did give Serkis a unique amount of freedom, it also had some bad implications.
Related
10 Biggest Star Wars Plot Holes In The Sequel Trilogy
The Star Wars sequel trilogy has received considerable criticism for its plot holes, and these 10 are the sequels’ most significant plot holes of all.
While not everything in Star Wars has to have deep lore connections, a figure as important as Snoke really should. It sounds as if Snoke’s Palpatine connection wasn’t even established until after Snoke had died in The Last Jedi, even if it was something that was discussed. Palpatine’s return has long since been a point of contention for Star Wars fans, particularly because it wasn’t strongly hinted at in the first two movies of the trilogy. Perhaps if Snoke had been given a more firmly established backstory in Star Wars early on, then Palpatine’s return may have felt more natural.
World News || Latest News || U.S. News
Source link