Spirit Airlines calls off a Thursday reckoning on Frontier’s bid.

On the eve of a planned shareholder meeting on an acquisition by Frontier Airlines, Spirit Airlines said Wednesday evening that it was putting off the vote and would continue to talk to both Frontier and a rival suitor, JetBlue.

The postponement, until July 8, was a stunning turn in a battle that analysts say could reshape the airline sector. The decision is a blow to the leaders of Frontier and Spirit, budget carriers that want to combine so they can more effectively compete with the nation’s four dominant airlines.

The Frontier stock-and-cash proposal values Spirit at roughly $2.4 billion, while JetBlue’s all-cash offer totals about $3.6 billion. There are also competing carrots to investors, like how much the rivals would pay shareholders if regulators blocked the deal — $350 million in the case of Spirit and $400 million in the case of JetBlue.

“This says both marriage proposals are attractive,” said Samuel Engel, a senior vice president and airline industry analyst at ICF, a consulting firm. “They want to see what the maximum dowry is that they can get.”

Frontier did not immediately reply to a request for comment on Spirit’s announcement.

JetBlue’s chief executive, Robin Hayes, celebrated the postponement, the second time that Spirit has pushed off a shareholder vote on the transaction. “It’s clear that Spirit shareholders have now handed the Spirit board an undeniable mandate to reach an agreement with JetBlue,” Mr. Hayes said in a statement.

Frontier argues that despite its offer’s lower nominal value, the share portion allows Spirit investors to further benefit should shares of the combined company climb. It has also attacked JetBlue’s bid as less likely to win regulatory approval. JetBlue contends that both bids are likely to be scrutinized.

Still, Frontier’s offer would also face a tough look from the Biden administration, which has taken a skeptical view of large corporate mergers. The number of big airlines has drastically declined over the past two decades as carriers have merged, and customers are currently upset with airlines as they contend with mass flight cancellations.

Shares of Spirit were up 2.2 percent, to $22.90, in after-hours trading on Wednesday but still well below the $33.50 that JetBlue has offered.

Spirit and Frontier announced a proposal to merge in February. Weeks later, JetBlue countered with its offer. What followed were rounds of one-upmanship and, at times, bitter words. Spirit dismissed JetBlue’s offer as a “cynical attempt” to disrupt its merger with Frontier, while JetBlue took aim at Spirit’s board, arguing that its ties with Frontier inhibited its objectivity in evaluating the deal.

Frontier’s chief executive, Barry Biffle, was a top Spirit executive from 2005 to 2013. William A. Franke, the chairman of Frontier, is also a managing partner of Indigo Partners. the private equity firm that once owned both companies. He is expected to head the board if the Frontier-Spirit deal is approved. Frontier, which is now public, remains majority owned by Indigo.

Last week, the influential advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services recommended that Spirit shareholders vote in favor of Frontier’s bid, a reversal from a prior recommendation based on a revised offer from Frontier. On Tuesday, JetBlue put forward yet another sweetened offer.

Combined, Frontier and Spirit would become the fifth-largest U.S. airline, with an 8.2 percent share of the market, putting it behind American, Southwest, Delta and United.

“If our shareholders don’t approve the Frontier deal, we’re back to a stand-alone,” Spirit’s chief executive, Ted Christie, said this week in an interview with The New York Times. “We have made clear the issues that we have with the JetBlue transaction.”

Spirit’s primary complaint about the JetBlue bid is that it would not secure regulatory approval, particularly given the antitrust scrutiny that JetBlue has garnered from the Justice Department over its alliance with American Airlines. The agency said in a lawsuit that American, the largest U.S. carrier, would use the partnership to “co-opt a uniquely disruptive competitor.” JetBlue and American deny that their deal is anticompetitive and are fighting the case in court.

Frontier and Spirit contend that with cost savings and a larger network, their combined carrier would be able to compete for more customers while still offering very low fares, pressuring larger rivals to hold down their fares, too.

One argument against a merger is that continued competition between Frontier and Spirit would force them to keep fares low. With a merger, some of that pressure would be relieved, which might lead them to raise not only fares but also fees — particularly on routes serving airports where both now operate, like Orlando, Fla.

Any acquisition of Spirit would have to pass muster with federal regulators. One reason that they might oppose a merger of Spirit and Frontier is that forcing the companies to remain rivals would push them to keep fares low.