Judge pauses Montana’s enforcement of law that makes it harder for transgender residents to modify their birth certificates
Two transgender residents sued, claiming the new law violates their constitutional right to privacy and due process, as well as the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. They argued that the law was vague and didn’t adequately describe the types of medical procedures required to satisfy the state’s definition of a sex change.
“Plaintiffs provided unrebutted evidence describing that neither gender-affirming surgery nor any other medical treatment that a transgender person undergoes changes that person’s sex,” Moses wrote. “Instead, gender-affirming surgery aligns a person’s body and lived in experience with the person’s gender identity, which already exists. Therefore it is unclear what type of ‘surgical procedure’ will meet the requirements to change ‘the sex of the person born in Montana’ given plaintiff’s evidence that no surgery changes a person’s sex.”
He continued: “The court finds that plaintiffs have established a prima facie case that SB 280 (is) impermissibly vague in all of its applications and thereby unconstitutionally violates plaintiffs’ fundamental right to due process because it is unconstitutionally void.”
CNN has reached out to Gianforte’s office for comment.
“We are thrilled that the court recognized the substantial and unnecessary burdens this law places upon transgender individuals in violation of their constitutional rights,” said Akilah Lane, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Montana, which helped bring the challenge.
“The court’s injunction affirms the basis of our case: that SB 280 intentionally targets transgender people for unequal treatment because, as Judge Moses wrote, ‘only transgender individuals are subjected to these procedures and burdens in order to have a birth certificate that accurately reflects their gender,'” she added.
World News || Latest News || U.S. News
Source link